Critically evaluate the effectiveness of the new actors in employment Essay

Critically evaluate the effectiveness of the new actors in employment relations in providing a viable alternative to employee representation - Essay Example They also have been ensuring there is equity among employees and efficiency to show fairness in the running of organisations (Rasmussen, 2005). Some of the old actors in employment relations include national unions especially the labour unions and the state`s government. Due to the failure of effectiveness of these actors, new actors have emerged who are relevant and effectively fight for the employees’ rights. The new actors include non-union bodies such as; company councils, works councils, consultative councils/committees (CCs), joint consultative committees (JCCs), staff associations and independent organisations such as; NGOs, HR consultancy firms, employment agencies, chaplains, health advisors and trainers, Citizens’ advice bureaus, global union federations, employment arbitrators, grassroots activists, social movements and counsellors. This essay henceforth evaluates the effectiveness of these new actors in employment relations in providing a viable alternative to employee`s representation. The new actors in employment relations are mostly comprised of non-union employee`s representation bodies and some independent organisations all with the aim of fighting for the employee`s rights and interests (â€Å"Employment Relationship†, 2011). Non-union bodies refer to those employees who do not belong to any labour unions. They have emerged due to the inadequacy of the labour unions to handle employees grievances effectively and failing to represent them properly. The company councils, works councils, consultative councils/committees (CCs), Joint Consultative Committees (JCCs), staff associations NGOs, consultancy firms, employment arbitrators and activists are some of non-union bodies who have shown interests in the fight for employee rights and interests in their workplaces. These new actors have come up with new ways of handling employee`s grievances and negotiating with their employers to the

Chapter 1 problems Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Chapter 1 problems - Assignment Example However, my utility of attending the game will be higher as compared to that of Joe because I had already paid more to get the best seat. Additionally, if we were to draw an indifference curve, I will be at a higher indifference curve than Joe (Frank & Bernanke, 2013). Therefore, my likelihood of attending the game at Syracuse will also be higher than that of Joe. This is because even if I will be late for the game because of the snowstorm I am assured of the best seat unlike Joe who did not even have a ticket to attend the game. The effects of change in price on quantity of garbage collected may be best explained by taking into consideration the law of demand and supply. This law states that when all other factors are held constant (ceteris Paribas) an increase in price may cause a decrease in quantity demanded (Arnold, 2010). On the contrary, a decrease in price may cause an increase in quantity demanded (Arnold, 2010). Therefore, in this case, the garbage was initially collected at $ 6 irrespective of the quantity causing the resident to supply even more cans of garbage. On the other hand, the change in price tag may have two significant effects on quantity of garbage collected. First the quantity of garbage collected will remain the same per average house hold. This is because for each can of garbage to be collected, residents of my city will be paying $2 per can which sum up to $6 for cans per average household. This means that the price per 3 cans will still be the same as the initial fixed price (Arno ld, 2010). The second effect is that, individual house hold may decide to supply less cans of garbage to minimize cost (Arnold, 2010).This is because consumers are rational which means that they always try to minimize cost and maximize their utility subject to their income constraint (Arnold,